Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6355 14
Original file (NR6355 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906

HD -
Docket No. NR6355-14
Ly Fepruary 2015

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

To: Secretary of the Navy

sj, ae

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records .
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 11. ("Administrative
Remarks (1070)") entry dated 6 April 2006. A copy of the contested
entry is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ee
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

19 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

-to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and reguiations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. Incorrespondence at enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine
Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's
case has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

Ref (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 22 Apr 14 w/attachment :
: (2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 6 Feb 15 ;
(3) Subject’s naval record
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated
6 April 2006. This is to be accomplished by physically removing the
page 11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating the
entry so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, .
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

Recorder

S. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7373 14

    Original file (NR7373 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 21 June 2012 (copy at Tab A). 2, The Board, consisting cf =} iis MMMM, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14

    Original file (NR2570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14

    Original file (NR5737 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8392 14

    Original file (NR8392 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 16 May 2014. The Board, having reviewed al ry and injustice, finds as follows: to Petitioner's allegations of erro a, Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14

    Original file (NR8961 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6393 14

    Original file (NR6393 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    damarv 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 September 2012 {copy at Tab #). The Board, fe sens sions of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3392 14

    Original file (NR3392 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entries dated 16 February and 7 October 2012 (copies at Tabs A and B, respectively) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2015, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5935 14

    Original file (NR5935 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 March 2013 and. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5316 14

    Original file (NR5316 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llic) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) °} entry dated 21 March 2011 {copy at Tab A). a reviewed be onér's Bilegations of error and injustice on 25 January 202 a pursuant to its regulations, devermined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9378 14

    Original file (NR9378 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 30 March 2005. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...